Session Twelve, 13th February 2017
Question and answer session and discussion with Baptiste Bedessem based on the previous session’s presentation.
Download the presentation (protected by password)
Working Group
- CIVISTI and the ideal conversation: a comparison of two modes of setting the scientific research agenda / Ordinary citizens vs Stakeholders: which “public” should participate in well-ordered science?
- An ideal ordinary citizen?
- Achieving cognitive Pareto-optimality: Democratising scientific enquiry whilst reconciling liberty and equality in the choice process
- The scientific expert, last fortress against post-truth? / Conferences briefing
- “Invisible hand” or centralised planning? A pragmatic perspective on the governance of science – Q&A Session and Discussion
- A ladder of citizen participation for science policy / “Invisible hand” or centralised planning? A pragmatic perspective on the governance of science
- Scientific Expert Committees, Wicked Problems and Procedure (Presentation) / “A ladder of citizen participation” (Reading)
- Science for policy and the scientification of politics
- The governance of science and the division of cognitive labour: Q&A session and discussion
- The governance of science and the division of cognitive labour
- Ordering science in a democratic society
- An inversion of priorities : Kitcher vs CIVISTI on ideal deliberation regarding research goals
- Tools to think about a democratic model of the governance of science (Part II)
- Tools to think about a democratic model of the governance of science (Part I)
- Science, Democracy and Relativism : The Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge from the Viewpoint of Communitarian Epistemology
- Power and Knowledge
- Böhme, Van Den Daele & Krohn, “Finalization in Science” (1976)
- ParPolity : Political Vision for a Good Society
- The Third Wave of Science Studies : Studies of Expertise and Experience
- Conditions of Science: The Three-Way Tension of Freedom, Accountability and Utility